Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science

URI permanente para esta comunidadhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12640/4090

La Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science (JEFAS), de la Universidad ESAN, es una publicación académica de acceso abierto que presenta investigaciones revisadas por pares en administración, economía y finanzas, con un enfoque en el contexto latinoamericano e iberoamericano. Fundada en 1992 como Cuadernos de Difusión, en 2009 cambió de nombre a su actual denominación como JEFAS. Ha evolucionado en colaboración con importantes editoriales, como Elsevier y actualmente Emerald Publishing. La revista publica investigaciones de alta calidad sin costo para los autores, con el respaldo de ESAN y su compromiso con la difusión del conocimiento científico y académico, y la práctica gerencial.

Examinar

Filtros

19931

Ajustes

Autor: search.filters.author.Adaniya, Ana RosaTema: search.filters.subject.Asymmetries between organizations

Resultados de la búsqueda

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
  • Miniatura
    ÍtemSolo Metadatos
    Hacia el cierre de los «cementerios de proyectos». Por qué fracasan las redes estratégicas: el caso de los proyectos de desarrollo con fondos internacionales
    (Universidad ESAN. ESAN Ediciones, 1993-12-30) Adaniya, Ana Rosa
    It seeks to find the reasons why development projects fail focusing the analysis on the initial stage of strategic networks, considering that these projects conceptually fall within the definition of strategic networks. For this, the so-called grounded theory method of analysis is used, which allows the theory to be "discovered" from very detailed descriptions of what is observed. The unit of analysis are economic development projects financed with international funds, of which a small sample is taken. It is concluded that it is not only the lack of money that prevents the approval and implementation of projects, but also the asymmetries between organizations, as it is suggested that managerial and technological capacities, as well as legitimacy and trust, are not used to balance the subordinate position in which local organizations are found. However, it is argued that a better management of asymmetries will avoid the recurrence of the dominant-submissive behavior observed in the initiation of projects and will allow greater flexibility, which will result in the best design of the projects and increase the possibilities of their successful execution.